Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott McArthur
Scott McArthur was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to move the page to userspace.
- Delete. I suppose we're not allowed to shoot the author? --Tagishsimon (talk)
- Delete. A nobody, this should be a speedy delete Edward 20:27, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- It should clearly be deleted, yes, but putting pages through a deletion process before deleting gives the creator a chance to understand why it was deleted and feel that he has the chance to get a fair say. So in summery I think there is a good reason this is not a speedy delete candidate by the rules. Thue | talk 20:33, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- We get to look at that photo for the next five days? Groovy. :^) Delete as patent vanity. - Lucky 6.9 20:39, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- These really should be speedy deletes, the "article" and the photo. Postdlf 21:28, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Move to User:Scottmcarthur, then speedy redir? Niteowlneils 22:32, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Good idea. It's a good start of a user page, anyway. - Lucky 6.9 22:37, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. GRider 21:43, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Don't delete. I may not be famous, but how often do you type your own name into a search engine to see if there are other people with your name and what they are like? This could actually start a useful trend, especially if a format is specified. scottmcarthur 21:43, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Moved into a user page. Resultant redirect speedy deleted under redirect case 2. Rossami (talk) 07:47, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.